The Bluest Eye - Morrisons Attempt to Induce White Guilt :: Bluest Eye Essays

The Bluest Eye - Morrisons Attempt to Induce White GuiltIve heard the fictionalisation before, three times in fact. Originally, the oracle in question was invariably an old man, an Asian philosopher and blind. The boys carried in a live snort, not a dead bird as she described as a broken bundle of life sacrificed or the absence of bird altogether. The boys asked the same question. If the philosopher answered dead, they would permit it fly a federal agency, but if he answered alive, they would kill it and drop it at his feet, proving him faulty with either answer. When the old, wise, blind man was presented with the question, he pondered it a bit and deduced their scheme. He answered, The fate of that bird is in your hands. Toni Morrison altered the fable in her Nobel cherish Acceptance Speech, offering her perception of it, which is understandable as she is a writer and is building an analogy to it. Writers often focus on perception in stories and some writers need to as in the case of Morrison and The Bluest Eye. The perception and intend of view in which the story is told to the reader is essential for Morrison to build her case. She inevitably to suck the reader into her framework of bring forwarding using stories of abuse and discharge to create compassion and sympathy for the characters of her story. The catch is, shes not telling a story so much as selling a product. When a good salesman pushes an item, the first step is to have the audience succumb to his way of thinking. Morrisons product here is a philosophy, an idea that is the theme of her book. That idea is that carnal beauty is probably the most destructive idea in the memorial of human thought. She pushes this idea right through the readers brain. It is the ruin of the black girls. If exclusively they were pretty. If only they had pretty blue eyes. We might be able to think of beauty as the bird. True beauty, in Morrisons ideology, would be the absence of the bird. abstracted in physical attributes, but representative of all things free and without boundaries. If the bird is present, whether alive or dead, the physical intrusiveness of it then defines its beauty.